Somnambulist '57

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Alastair Gordon

I'm on the emailing list of the "Canadian Coalition for Democracies" (Alastair Gordon, President).

Today, I received (in my email inbox), a copy of Mr. Gordon's latest contribution to the National Post.

It's a beauty, and here it is:

When Stephen Harper addresses the UN today, Alastair Gordon hopes his remarks might sound something like this...

Ladies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to be here today. Where to start? Let's go to the Far East and work our way round the globe.

- Taiwan is a peaceful, self-made democracy with the world's 17th largest economy. Yet it has consistently been denied entry to the UN. Meanwhile, Iran, a wretched theocracy threatening the world with nuclear Armageddon, is a member not only of the UN General Assembly, but also of the Human Rights Council. Canada will now support Taiwan's full participation in the UN and its agencies. I am also taking this opportunity to announce Canada's withdrawal from the "One China" policy embraced by my predecessor.

- Across the Taiwan Strait, there is mainland China, the largest recipient of Canadian foreign aid. Tell me: Why does a $1-trillion economy send its tax dollars to an $8-trillion economy? Should a manufacturing colossus such as China enjoy the preferential tariffs normally reserved for a developing nation? Are we helping China buy the missiles it aims at Taiwan? Simply put, our aid for China is over.

- Moving south and west, we come to India. India has been independent for less than 60 years, yet has created the world's largest democracy with the world's largest middle class. Canada will sponsor a resolution proposing that India become the next permanent member of the UN Security Council.

- Next, Iran. Attention, Europe: The nuclear missiles Iran wants to build will be able to incinerate your cities. Yet many of you pander to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by demonizing Israel and America, while secretly praying that they neutralize Iran and save your hides. Smart people shouldn't appease an apocalyptic madman like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. If you insist on doing so again, you'll be on your own when Paris is reduced to radioactive rubble.

- Afghanistan. Here, the UN took a principled position. I am grateful to the men and women who make up the UN-authorized forces in that country. But I really do not understand this talk of a "traditional" peacekeeping and rebuilding mission as distinct from a combat mission. Rebuilding Afghanistan while the Taliban remain active is like building homes in the middle of a brush fire, while proclaiming that there is no need to first extinguish the flames. I am proud to tell you that Canada's army is staying the course in Afghanistan.

- And now we come to Israel. In its first 42 years, the UN tabled 370 resolutions condemning Israel and zero resolutions critical of the PLO or any Arab state. When Syria slaughtered 20,000 of its own citizens at Hama in 1982, or when it sponsored the destruction and occupation of Lebanon, or even when Iraq massacred its Kurdish citizens with poison gas ... nothing. So here's Canada's approach: We will vote no on every anti-Israel resolution until we see such reprimands applied even-handedly against all players in the Middle East according to the scale of their misdeeds.

Following the election of Hamas in Palestinian elections this year, Canada stopped funding the Palestinian Authority. Now a contrived "Unity Government" has its hand out for more Western aid. Should we really provide funding to parties whose goal is to obliterate Israel? Maybe if the Palestinians were forced to provide a real education to their children and build a real economy instead of living off Western welfare, they could become a fierce economic competitor, and pummel Israel in the marketplace of goods, services and ideas. (That would do more economic harm to Israel than, say, the United Church Womyns' Collective boycotting Jaffa oranges.)

- For decades, the world's refugee problems have been resolved through UNHCR. Only one group of refugees, the Palestinians, has its own refugee agency, UNRWA. Fifty-five years after its founding, the plight of Palestinian refugees is worse than ever. UNRWA is complicit in an education system that teaches children to hate Jews and glorify martyrdom, and provides Hamas with money for terror. Canada will end its funding of UNRWA, and direct those resources to UNHCR.

Finally, I would like to offer an invitation. There are a few members of the UN who recognize that a brutal global jihad is being waged against the free world, but more who are friends or appeasers of that jihad. Today, I am inviting the leaders of those democratic nations who have proven their commitment to defending freedom and tolerance to join me at a Conference of Free Nations to be held in Canada. There, we will take the historic first steps in forging a Western alliance to defeat this brutal common enemy.

Thank you.

© National Post 2006

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

YAAFM vs. The High Road

There is a large segment of the population that can engage quite effectively in the debate with respect to Global Terrorism, the Middle East, and ever-increasing atrocities undertaken by members of the "Religion of Peace".

For example, and even though a previous post of mine looked upon the man with disdain, Eric Margolis is intelligent enough to put forward his ideas in a rational form, regardless of how misguided I (or anyone else) happens to think he is.

This is what I consider to be the "high road" of debate: sound ideas articulated in the hope that through logic and reasoning, you'll be able to sway the opinion of others.

On the other hand, there's a group of people who are simply so far beyond intellectual redemption that there's just no point in discussing anything with them. This group rears its head on a semi-regular basis in our country, and the cream of the crop has now risen to such a level of stupidity, that the only thing you can say is "YAAFM".

I give you lowlights from the Toronto Star's latest "Voices" column, and people's opinion of the fifth anniversary of 9/11, and the prospect of another terrorist attack.

Brace yourself.

"I am not worried about a terrorist attack. I am tired of the fear mongering by the governments and the media." Katryn Gerrard, Cambridge, Ont.

"No! I'm more worried the greedy buggers running our oil companies will continue to fleece us by pretending they have nothing to do with the world price of oil. They will create further havoc by reinvesting little in their infrastructure causing further increases when the rusty pipes leak." Mike Murphy, Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.

"I will worry more if the war mongering politicians are low in the polls for re-election. When Bush was down in the polls, 9/11 happened. When Blair was down in the polls, the London bombings happened. As Harper was loosing support, Canadian Security Intelligence Services busted an alleged terrorist ring about to attack Canada. Could it all be coincidence?" Bryan McNaughton, St. Catharines

"No. I'd be more worried about mortgage title fraudsters, or getting shot in a drive-by." Colin Rutter, Toronto

"It won't happen in Canada if your government is wise enough to get out now and stop lending Canada's name to the evil empire's crusade to take over the Middle East to line the pockets of U.S. corporations." Paul Perkins, San Francisco, Calif.

Katryn, Mike, Bryan, Colin, and Paul:

YAAFM(s)

Sunday, September 03, 2006

Give it up, Eric

It seems as though The Toronto Sun's Eric Margolis is determined to continue his slide into irrelevance.

Take a peek at his column of last week at http://www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/Margolis_Eric/2006/08/27/1779431-sun.html

In it, you'll find his well-crafter rationale as to why the Tamil Tigers are "freedom fighters", as opposed to the Canadian-Government recognized terrorists they are.

Perhaps wishing to outdo himself, this week's missive at http://www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/Margolis_Eric/2006/09/02/1797803.html takes aim at Donald Rumsfeld's remarks on Islamic "appeasers". He (Margolis) consummates his column (and quite possibly his career as an effective commentator) by stating "The real closet fascists are in North America".

My take?

I guess he didn't like being referred to as an "appeaser", and decided to throw what little common sense he had left out the window, prior to putting pen to paper.

Knock, Knock.

Hey Eric - get that would you? It's the "clue" door.

Saturday, September 02, 2006

Jack Layton - Canada's Shame

Even if one were to put aside feelings about the man's politics, Jack Layton can't help but come across as the pompous fool he his.

Here's this week's ramblings:

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2006/08/31/1789786-cp.html

In part:

"NDP Leader Jack Layton says Canada should pull its troops out of Afghanistan by February because the mission has gone astray."

"...Layton said the Afghan mission has lost its direction. It has no clear goals, no exit strategy and no criteria to judge success, he said at a news conference Thursday. 'This is not the right mission for Canada,' he said. 'There is no balance. In particular, it lacks a comprehensive rebuilding plan and commensurate development assistance.' ""



Hey Jack: Develop this:

Friday, September 01, 2006

The "Red Cross Rocket" - You decide

Earlier posts to this blog highlighted, I think, a war-within-a-war.

I'm referring to the highly successful propaganda war waged by Hezbollah - against the Israelis - within the confines of the western media.

Here's a refutal worth reading:


http://theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20308892-7583,00.html?from=rss

You decide.

Personally, I think Hezbollah staged the whole thing, with a very educated eye as to how this war will be won - not on the battlefield, but at the breakfast table.